A follow-up comment to yesterday's post about Lie-tenant Carter's bullshit:
- It should be noted that she was attempting to gain entry through the fire door because she was late for class. She was only in a hurry because she was given a heads up that a federal monitor was sitting in a class all day and was told to report immediately.
Late for class? Who's keeping track?
- Everyone in the class says she was only there half the time this past week. She must be very important or something.
For everyone keeping score at home:
- couldn't score in the top 1,000, so gifted a sergeant spot;
- part of the Gene Williams "study" group that had the test, so made first lie-tenant class;
- sent to Captain school, but can barely be bothered to show up and has to be called at home to show up because a Federal monitor is auditing the class for Consent Decree purposes.
"Earned, not Given" isn't a Mission Statement - it's a punchline.
Hey Lori, are you reading? Is one of your drones reading, keeping an eye on the subversives who post here? Would you like a free suggestion that would go aways in gaining the trust of the rank-and-file?
Hey Lori, are you reading? Is one of your drones reading, keeping an eye on the subversives who post here? Would you like a free suggestion that would go aways in gaining the trust of the rank-and-file?
- Make an example of one out-of-control, corrupt, unfit-to-lead Captain candidate.
Yank her out of class, send her back to whatever clout heavy unit she's occupying, and then dump her to midnights wherever CPD is short a field lieutenant. You show everyone that there are consequences for being an arrogant moron and embarrassing the Department (your Department by the way - you will be blamed or credited), and others undeserving of their "Given" spots are suddenly a bit more wary, and maybe a bit more thankful for what they've been gifted.
Of course, the words "Chicago" and "consequences" rarely go together in the same sentence. But we've been wrong before.
Of course, the words "Chicago" and "consequences" rarely go together in the same sentence. But we've been wrong before.
No comments:
Post a Comment